Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Donnelly v Maxwell-Smith (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 1 Citation: Donnelly v Maxwell-Smith (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 1
Related to: Donnelly v Maxwell-Smith [2010] FCAFC 154
Parties: MAX CHRISTOPHER DONNELLY v INGE AND EUGENE MAXWELL-SMITH
File number: NSD 630 of 2010
Judges: BENNETT, RARES AND MCKERRACHER JJ
Date of judgment: 3 February 2011
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of applicant's/ appellant's submission: 4 January 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 3
Solicitor for the applicant/ Church & Grace appellant:
Respondent: Self represented
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 630 of 2010
BETWEEN: MAX CHRISTOPHER DONNELLY
Appellant
AND: INGE AND EUGENE MAXWELL-SMITH
Respondent
JUDGES: BENNETT, RARES AND MCKERRACHER JJ DATE OF ORDER: 3 FEBRUARY 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. Order 3 made on 16 December 2010 be amended to read: "3. The applicant pay the respondents' costs of the appeal and application for leave to appeal including, there being no opposition by the applicant, their costs of travelling to and attending at the hearing in Sydney." Note: Settlement and entry of orders is dealt with in Order 36 of the Federal Court Rules. The text of entered orders can be located using Federal Law Search on the Court's website.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate