Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Vinciguerra [2011] FCAFC 31 Citation: MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd v Vinciguerra [2011] FCAFC 31
Appeal from: Vinciguerra v MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 763
Parties: MG CORROSION CONSULTANTS PTY LTD ACN 084 715 177 v ALBERTO CESARIO VINCIGUERRA
File number: WAD 260 of 2010
Judges: NORTH, MCKERRACHER AND JAGOT JJ
Date of judgment: 10 March 2011
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS - Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – s 237 - derivative action – requirements of s 237(2) – whether it is probable that a company would not itself bring proceedings – rebuttable presumption in s 237(3)
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 237 Federal Court Rules O 52 r 36
Cases cited: Maher v Honeysett & Maher Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd [2005] NSWSC 859 South Johnston Hill Ltd v Dennis (2007) 163 FCR 343 Swansson v R A Pratt Properties Pty Ltd (2002) 42 ACSR 313 Vigliaroni v Concrete Precast Systems Pty Ltd [2009] VSC 253 Vinciguerra v MG Corrosion Consultants Pty Ltd (2007) 61 ACSR 583
Date of hearing: 22 February 2011
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 76
Counsel for the Appellant: MJ McCusker QC with KA Dundo
Solicitor for the Appellant: Q Legal
Counsel for the Respondent: DH Solomon
Solicitor for the Respondent: Solomon Brothers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 260 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate