Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Reece v Webber [2011] FCAFC 33 Citation: Reece v Webber [2011] FCAFC 33
Appeal from: Reece v Webber [2010] FCA 1025
Parties: DR ALBERT STUART REECE v TONY WEBBER; BERNARD KELLY, KATHLEEN KEATING AND AILSA LAIDLAW CONSTITUTING THE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES REVIEW COMMITTEE NO. 507; THE DETERMINING AUTHORITY ESTABLISHED BY SECTION 106Q OF THE HEALTH INSURANCE ACT 1973 (CTH); AND THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
File number: NSD 1342 of 2010
Judges: JACOBSON, FLICK AND REEVES JJ
Date of judgment: 11 March 2011
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – reasonable apprehension of bias – statutory requirement to provide draft report – failure to consider submissions made – need to separately address expert opinions in submission PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to amend Notice of Appeal – argument not raised below – limited factual dispute – application to adduce further evidence
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 27 Health Insurance Act 1973 (Cth) ss 82, 84, 85, 101, 102, 106, 106A, 106KD, 106L, 106T
Cases cited: Anderson v Director-General of the Department of Environmental and Climate Change [2008] NSWCA 337, 251 ALR 633, cited Australian Postal Corporation v Sellick [2008] FCA 236, 101 ALD 245, cited Australian Retailers Association v Reserve Bank of Australia [2005] FCA 1707, 148 FCR 446, cited Applicant WAEE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 184, 75 ALD 630, considered British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Laurie [2009] NSWCA 414, cited British American Tobacco Australia Services Ltd v Laurie [2011] HCA 2, considered CDJ v VAJ [1998] HCA 67, 197 CLR 172, referred to Chamberlain v The Queen (1983) 72 FLR 1, referred to Commissioner of Taxation v Osborne (1990) 26 FCR 63, 95 ALR 654, referred to Commissioner of Taxation v Walker (1984) 2 FCR 283, referred to Cottrell v Wilcox [2002] FCA 232, considered Dart Industries Inc v Décor Corporation Pty Ltd (1989) 15 IPR 403, referred to Dreamtech International Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCAFC 103, 187 FCR 352, considered Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48, 201 CLR 488, considered Jones v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2002] FCA 1054, 76 ALD 424, cited Jones v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] FCAFC 164, 131 FCR 216, cited Khan v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (Federal Court of Australia, Gummow J, 11 December 1987), 14 ALD 291, cited Lawyers for Forests Inc v Minister for the Environment, Heritage and the Arts [2009] FCA 330, 165 LGERA 203, considered Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS [2010] HCA 48, 273 ALR 122, considered Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte AB (2000) 177 ALR 225, referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Anthonypillai [2001] FCA 274, 106 FCR 426, referred to Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng [2001] HCA 17, 205 CLR 507, considered Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf [2001] HCA 30, 206 CLR 323, considered NASB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 24, considered Penhall-Jones v New South Wales [2007] FCA 925, referred to R v Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission; Ex parte Angliss Group [1969] HCA 10, 122 CLR 546, considered Re JRL; Ex parte CJL [1986] HCA 39, 161 CLR 342, considered SBBF v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCAFC 358, referred to SCAA v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 668, considered Sobey v Nicol [2007] FCAFC 136, 245 ALR 389, considered SZEHN v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 1389, referred to SZHOP v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2006] FCA 1640, cited SZHPI v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 306, cited SZAXY v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 76, referred to SZLVN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2008] FCA 1301, cited University of Wollongong v Metwally (No 2) [1985] HCA 28, 60 ALR 68, considered VUAX v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 158, referred to WAEH of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2002] FCAFC 364, cited WAJR v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 106, 80 ALD 435, referred to Williams v Minister for the Environment and Heritage [2003] FCA 535, 74 ALD 124, cited John McMillan, 'Judicial Restraint and Activism in Administrative Law' (2002) 30 Federal Law Review 335
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate