Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Dib Group Pty Ltd v Coolabah Tree Aust-Wide Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 57 Citation: Dib Group Pty Ltd v Coolabah Tree Aust-Wide Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 57
Appeal from: Coolabah Tree Aust-Wide Pty Ltd v Dib Group Pty Limited [2010] FCA 805
Parties: DIB GROUP PTY LTD v COOLABAH TREE AUST-WIDE PTY LTD
File number(s): NSD 1046 of 2010
Judges: GRAY, LANDER AND KATZMANN JJ
Date of judgment: 3 May 2011
Corrigendum: 30 May 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – power to vary judgment or order pursuant to Federal Court Rules O 35 r 7 – publication of supplementary reasons for judgment and new orders DAMAGES – whether primary judge erred in assessment of damages for repudiation of lease APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – witness for one party preferred to those of another – circumstances under which credibility findings made by primary judge may be revisited on appeal TRADE PRACTICES – misleading and deceptive conduct – representations as to future matters – whether representations made in terms alleged – whether representations were misleading or deceptive – circumstances under which representations are adopted or endorsed – application of test in Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd (2004) 218 CLR 592 – reliance – whether company relied on representations regarding predicted turnover of business – whether inferences should have been drawn in favour of cross-appellant EVIDENCE – credibility – where witness not called by cross-respondent – whether primary judge failed to draw Jones v Dunkel inference despite saying he would PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – argument on appeal not put in court below – not entertained
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate