Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Comcare v Broadhurst (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 60 Citation: Comcare v Broadhurst (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 60
Appeal from: Broadhurst v Comcare [2010] FCA 1034
Parties: COMCARE v KAREN BROADHURST; KAREN BROADHURST v COMCARE
File number: ACD 36 of 2010
Judges: DOWNES, TRACEY AND FLICK JJ
Date of judgment: 6 May 2011
Catchwords: COSTS – Notice of Motion – liberty to apply – variation of costs order
Legislation: Federal Court Rules O 35 r 7
Cases cited: Comcare v Broadhurst [2011] FCAFC 39, cited
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of last submissions: 18 April 2011
Place: Sydney (Heard in Canberra)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 12
Counsel for the Appellant/Cross-Respondent: Mr D O'Donovan
Solicitor for the Appellant/Cross-Respondent: DibbsBarker
Counsel for the Respondent/Cross-Appellant: Mr R Crowe SC
Solicitor for the Respondent/Cross-Appellant: Capital Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA AUSTRALIAN CAPITAL TERRITORY DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION ACD 36 of 2010
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: COMCARE
Appellant/Cross-Respondent
AND: KAREN BROADHURST
Respondent/Cross-Appellant
JUDGES: DOWNES, TRACEY AND FLICK JJ DATE OF ORDER: 6 MAY 2011 WHERE MADE: SYDNEY (HEARD IN CANBERRA)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate