Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Setka v Gregor [2011] FCAFC 64 Citation: Setka v Gregor [2011] FCAFC 64
Appeal from: Gregor v Setka [2010] FMCA 690
Parties: JOHN SETKA v MURRAY GREGOR
File number: VID 10 of 2011
Judges: LANDER, TRACEY AND YATES JJ
Date of judgment: 12 May 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – bias – recusal application – reasonable apprehension of bias test applied no bias may be reasonably apprehended – application refused
Legislation: Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s 767
Cases cited: Cabcharge Australia Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2010] FCAFC 111 cited Ebney v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 cited Livesey v New South Wales Bar Association (1983) 151 CLR 288 applied McCreed v The Queen (2003) A Crim R 417 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507 cited Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Ltd v Concrete Pty Ltd (2005) 144 FCR 264 cited Re JRL; ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 cited, applied
Date of hearing: 9 May 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr P G Priest QC
Solicitor for the Appellant: Slater and Gordon
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr J L Bourke QC & Ms J M Maclean
Solicitor for the Respondent: Clayton Utz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 10 of 2011
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate