Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Fortescue Metals Group (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 68 Citation: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Fortescue Metals Group (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 68
Appeal from: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Fortescue Metals Group Ltd (No 5) [2009] FCA 1586
Parties: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION v FORTESCUE METALS GROUP LTD (ACN 002 594 872) and JOHN ANDREW HENRY FORREST
File number(s): WAD 23 of 2010
Judges: KEANE CJ, EMMETT AND FINKELSTEIN JJ
Date of judgment: 20 May 2011
Catchwords: CORPORATIONS – specificity in relation to declarations - variation of orders.
Legislation: Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 180(1), 674(2), 672(2A), 1041H, 1317E; Federal Court Rules r 7(3), O 35
Date of hearing: 22, 23, 24, 25, 29, 30 November 2010
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 8
Solicitor for the Appellant: Mr Beau Deleuil and Ms Danielle Eaton of Mallesons Stephen Jaques
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Mr Mark van Brakel and Mr Mark Hyde of Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Solicitor for the Second Respondent: Mr James Scovell of Gadens
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION WAD 23 of 2010
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION
Appellant
AND: FORTESCUE METALS GROUP LTD (ACN 002 594 872)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate