Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZONJ [2011] FCAFC 85 Citation: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZONJ [2011] FCAFC 85
Appeal from: SZONJ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FMCA 1
Parties: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP v SZONJ and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 159 of 2011
Judges: EMMETT, RARES & PERRAM JJ
Date of judgment: 12 July 2011
Catchwords: MIGRATION – where application made for protection visa – where visa applicant had been the victim of sustained domestic violence in her home state – whether visa applicant's claim came within the purview of refugee law according to the definition of 'refugee' in art 1A of the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees 1951 – whether state failure to protect the visa applicant from persecution arose for a Convention reason – whether mere inability of the state to protect the visa applicant satisfied the principle in Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Khawar (2002) 210 CLR 1 that the motivation of the state may satisfy Convention requirements where the persecution complained of is by private citizens – held that inability may be relevant to the existence of well-founded fear but that toleration or condonation is required to make out a nexus with a Convention reason ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – jurisdictional error – whether Refugee Review Tribunal erred in construing the test to be applied in determining whether visa applicant was a person to whom Australia owed protection obligations – held that reasons of Tribunal were unexceptionable
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate