Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
British American Tobacco Australia Limited v Secretary, Department of Health and Ageing [2011] FCAFC 107 Citation: British American Tobacco Australia Limited v Secretary, Department of Health and Ageing [2011] FCAFC 107
Appeal from: Philip Morris Limited and British American Tobacco Australia Limited and Department of Health and Ageing [2011] AATA 215
Parties: BRITISH AMERICAN TOBACCO AUSTRALIA LIMITED v SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND AGEING
File number(s): VID 314 of 2011
Judges: KEANE CJ, DOWNES AND BESANKO JJ
Date of judgment: 23 August 2011
Catchwords: Freedom of Information – legal professional privilege – whether impliedly waived – whether acts of disclosure are inconsistent with the maintenance of the privilege – legal advice referred to in Government Response – tabling of Government Response in Senate and publication on government website – summary of legal advice to committee members – voluntary disclosure of summary in course of proceedings – advantage to person seeking to maintain the privilege or disadvantage to others which gives rise to possibility of inconsistency - no waiver of the privilege. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether the disclosures are proceedings in parliament and precluded from being considered for the purpose of determining waiver of legal professional privilege – whether issues on appeal raise errors of law or fact.
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 s 44 Bill of Rights 1688 art 9 Evidence Act 1995 s 122 Freedom of Information Act 1982 ss 15, 42 Freedom of Information Amendment (Reform) Act 2010 National Health and Medical Research Council Act 1992 Parliamentary Privileges Act 1987 s 16
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate