Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Dunghutti Elders Council (Aboriginal Corporation) RNTBC v Registrar of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporations (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 110 Citation: Dunghutti Elders Council (Aboriginal Corporation) RNTBC v Registrar of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporations (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 110
Appeal from: Dunghutti Elders Council (Aboriginal Corporation) RNTBC v Registrar of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporations [2011] FCA 370
Parties: DUNGHUTTI ELDERS COUNCIL (ABORIGINAL CORPORATION) RNTBC, CAROLINE BRADSHAW, MARY-LOU BUCK, CEDRIC BUTTON, EILEEN BUTTON, MARY ELLEN BUTTON, MARGARET RUTH CAMPBELL-MARUCA, CYRIL DAVIS, MAVIS DAVIS, CECILIA FLANDERS, GARY MORRIS, KEVIN STEWART and MURIEL MAY VALE v REGISTRAR OF ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER CORPORATIONS and PETER ARMSTRONG
File number: NSD 500 of 2011
Judges: KEANE CJ, LANDER AND FOSTER JJ
Date of judgment: 25 August 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – whether a judgment of the Full Court should be reopened in order to address an argument with which the first appellant contends the Full Court failed to deal – contentious argument not put before the primary judge or on appeal – application to reopen refused
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate