Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Rana v Repatriation Commission [2011] FCAFC 123 Citation: Rana v Repatriation Commission [2011] FCAFC 123
Appeal from: Rana v Repatriation Commission [2010] FCA 280
Parties: RANJIT SHAMSHER JUNG BAHADUR RANA v REPATRIATION COMMISSION
File number: SAD 36 of 2010
Judges: KENNY, STONE AND LOGAN JJ
Date of judgment: 21 September 2011
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Administrative Appeals Tribunal – practice and procedure – judicial review of decision of the Tribunal to proceed by way of determining an antecedent question – decision open to Tribunal to make in the exercise of its powers under the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) – no denial of procedural fairness in deciding to hear the antecedent question – no utility in judicial review application – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Constitution s 75(v) Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) ss 33, 43, 44 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) Defence Service Homes Act 1918 (Cth) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) ss 68, 69, 70
Cases cited: Adam P Brown Male Fashions Pty Ltd v Philip Morris Inc (1981) 148 CLR 170 considered Director-General of Social Services v Chaney (1980) 47 FLR 80 cited Drake v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1979) 46 FLR 409 applied Rana v Repatriation Commission [2010] FCA 280 affirmed Rana v Repatriation Commission [2010] FCA 281 cited Re Rana and Repatriation Commission [2009] AATA 671 cited Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 followed Whiteman v Department of Veterans' Affairs (1996) 69 FCR 510 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate