Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Kooee Communications Pty Ltd v Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 141 Citation: Kooee Communications Pty Ltd v Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 141
Appeal from: Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd v Kooee Communications Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 8
Parties: KOOEE COMMUNICATIONS PTY LTD ACN 001 341 331 v PRIMUS TELECOMMUNICATIONS PTY LTD ACN 071 191 396
File number(s): VID 150 of 2011
Judges: GILMOUR, JAGOT AND NICHOLAS JJ
Date of judgment: 15 November 2011
Catchwords: COSTS – entitlement of successful appellant to restitution of moneys paid under primary judgment – whether order for apportionment of costs appropriate – whether appellant entitled to indemnity costs due to offers of compromise rejected by respondent – relationship between provisions of Federal Court Rules 1979 and Federal Court Rules 2011 in respect of costs consequences of rejection of offers of compromise
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1979 (Cth) s 52 Federal Court Rules 1979 O 23 r 11, O 35 r 8 Federal Court Rules 2011 Rules 1.04, 1.35, 25.14, 39.06
Cases cited: Bowen Investments Pty Ltd v Tabcorp Holdings Ltd (No 2) [2008] FCAFC 107 Calderbank v Calderbank [1975] 3 All ER 333 Commonwealth v McCormack (1984) 155 CLR 273 Coshott v Learoyd [1999] FCA 276 Hughes v Western Australian Cricket Association Inc (1986) ATPR 40-748 Kooee Communications Pty Ltd v Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1316 Kooee Communications Pty Ltd v Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 119 McDonald v Parnell Laboratories (Aust) (No 2) (2007) 165 FCR 591 Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd v Kooee Communications Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1027 Woolworths Ltd v Strong (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 72
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate