Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Merck Sharp & Dohme (Australia) Pty Ltd v Peterson (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 146 Citation: Merck Sharp & Dohme (Australia) Pty Ltd v Peterson (No 2) [2011] FCAFC 146
Appeal from: Peterson v Merck Sharpe & Dohme (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 5) [2010] FCA 605 Application for leave to appeal: Peterson v Merck Sharpe & Dohme (Aust) Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 180
Parties: MERCK SHARP & DOHME (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD (ACN 000 173 508) v GRAEME ROBERT PETERSON MERCK SHARP & DOHME (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD (ACN 000 173 508) v GRAEME ROBERT PETERSON AS REPRESENTATIVE OF PERSONS WHO ALLEGE THEY ARE GROUP MEMBERS BY REASON OF THE CIRCUMSTANCE IN PARAGRAPH 2(c)(i) OF THE FURTHER AMENDED STATEMENT OF CLAIM IN VID 451 OF 2006
File numbers: VID 570 of 2010 VID 571 of 2010
Judges: KEANE CJ, BENNETT AND GORDON JJ
Date of judgment: 18 November 2011
Catchwords: COSTS – disposition of costs – costs follow the event.
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Date of written submissions: 31 October 2011
Place: Melbourne
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 10
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr B Walker SC with Mr C Loveday
Solicitor for the Appellant: Clayton Utz
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr JWK Burnside QC with Mr G Dalton
Solicitor for the Respondent: Slater & Gordon
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION VID 570 of 2010
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate