Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Smith v Marapikurrinya Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 150 Citation: Smith v Marapikurrinya Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 150
Appeal from: Smith v Marapikurrinya (No 2) [2011] FCA 733
Parties: GENE SMITH, MARY ATTWOOD, GEORGE DANN, SHIRLEY LOCKYER, PATRICIA MASON and ROBERT DANN v MARAPIKURRINYA PTY LTD (ACN 127 500 136), DIANA ROBINSON and KERRY ROBINSON
File number: WAD 244 of 2011
Judges: STONE, SIOPIS AND COLLIER JJ
Date of judgment: 25 November 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – standing to seek declaratory relief – whether application connected with Native Title Claim so as to be a matter arising under the Native Title Act – whether appellants, not being the applicant in the Native Title Claim, have standing to seek relief – s 62A Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) – standing to deal with matters arising under the Act granted exclusively to the "applicant" in a native title claim– whether trial judge erred in finding the appellants' lacked standing. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – consideration of principles concerning grant of declaratory relief – refusal to grant relief in exercise of discretion – no utility in making the declaration – no justiciable controversy
Legislation: Aboriginal Heritage Act 1972 (WA) Evidence Act 1995(Cth) s 191 Federal Magistrates Act 1999 (Cth) s 17A Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) s 62A Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Real Estate Institute of Western Australia Inc (1999) 161 ALR 79 Roe v Kimberley Land Council Aboriginal Corporation [2010] FCA 809 Smith v Marapikurrinya (No 2) [2011] FCA 733 Smith v Marapikurrinya Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 330 Smith v Marapikurrinya Pty Ltd [2010] FMCA 5
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate