Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Metcash Trading Limited [2011] FCAFC 151 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Metcash Trading Limited [2011] FCAFC 151
Appeal from: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Metcash Trading Limited [2011] FCA 967
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v METCASH TRADING LIMITED ACN 000 031 569 and PICK N PAY RETAILERS (PTY) LTD
File number(s): NSD 1533 of 2011
Judges: FINN, Buchanan, Yates JJ
Date of judgment: 30 November 2011
Catchwords: COMPETITION – merger – competition test – whether acquisition of shares in the capital of a body corporate would be likely to have the effect of substantially lessening competition in a market – real chance test discussed COMPETITION – counterfactual case – standard of proof – discussion of whether counterfactual case required to be established on balance of probabilities or on a real chance test – whether the primary judge erred in his evaluation of the counterfactual case as speculative COMPETITION – market definition – hypothetical monopolist test – functional level – whether market properly defined as a wholesale market – whether market should be defined by reference to multiple functional levels
Legislation: Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) ss 50(1), 50(3) Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 140
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Liquorland (Australia) Pty Ltd (2006) ATPR ¶42-123 Australian Gas Light Company v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 137 FCR 317 Australian Telecommunications Commission v Krieg Enterprises Pty Ltd (1976) 27 FLR 400 Boral Besser Masonry Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2003) 215 CLR 374 Bradshaw v McEwans Pty Ltd (1951) 217 ALR 1 Dandy Power Equipment Pty Ltd v Mercury Marine Pty Ltd (1982) 64 FLR 238 Global Sportsman Pty Ltd v Mirror Newspapers Pty Ltd (1984) 2 FCR 82 Howe v R (1980) 55 ALJR 5 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Lithgow City Council v Jackson (2011) 85 ALJR 1130; 281 ALR 223 Luxton v Vines (1952) 85 CLR 352 Momcilovic v R (2011) 85 ALJR 957; 280 ALR 221 Monroe Topple & Associates Pty Ltd v Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia (2002) 122 FCR 110 News Limited v Australian Rugby Football League Limited (1996) 64 FCR 410 Outboard Marine Australia Pty Ltd v Hecar Investments (No 6) Pty Ltd (1982) 66 FLR 120 Re Fortescue Metals Group Ltd (2010) 242 FLR 136 Re QIW Ltd (1995) 132 ALR 225 Re Queensland Co-operative Milling Association Ltd; Re Defiance Holdings Ltd (1976) 25 FLR 169 Seven Network Limited v News Limited [2007] FCA 1062 Seven Network Ltd v News Ltd (2009) 182 FCR 160 Sheen v Fields Pty Ltd (1984) 58 ALJR 93 Singapore Airlines Limited v Taprobane Tours WA Pty Ltd (1991) 33 FCR 158 Sydneywide Distributors Pty Ltd v Red Bull Australia Pty Ltd (2002) 55 IPR 354 Tillmanns Butcheries Pty Ltd v Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union (1978) 34 FLR 494 Tillmanns Butcheries Pty Ltd v Australasian Meat Industry Employees' Union (1979) 42 FLR 331 Trade Practices Commission v Ansett Transport Industries (Operations) Pty Ltd (1978) 32 FLR 305 Trade Practices Commission v TNT Management Pty Ltd (1985) 6 FCR 1 United States v EI du Pont de Nemours & Company (1956) 351 US 377 Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v ACCC (2003) 131 FCR 529 Heydon JD, Trade Practices Law (Lawbook Co., subscription service) at [3.245] (update 115) Smith R and Walker J, "Part IIIA Efficiency and Functional Markets" (1998) 5 Aust Jnl of Corp Law 1
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate