Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Jones v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2011] FCAFC 157 Citation: Jones v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2011] FCAFC 157
Appeal from: Jones v Civil Aviation Safety Authority [2011] FCA 632
Parties: MILTON STANLEY KNIGHT JONES v CIVIL AVIATION SAFETY AUTHORITY and HIS HONOUR MAGISTRATE DUNCAN REYNOLDS
File number: VID 629 of 2011
Judges: RARES, GILMOUR AND DODDS-STREETON JJ
Date of judgment: 2 December 2011
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Application to further amend notice of appeal – Appeal grounds or arguments not raised before primary judge – Whether expedient and in interests of justice to entertain new appeal grounds PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Warrant issued by Magistrate under s 32AF of Civil Aviation Act 1988 (Cth) – Whether Magistrate had reasonable grounds to suspect a particular thing may afford evidence of commission of a civil aviation offence
Legislation: Civil Aviation Act 1988 (Cth) s 32AF
Cases cited: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Oke (2007) 159 FCR 441 cited Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 cited Dunesky v Elder (1994) 54 FCR 540 discussed Federal Commissioner of Taxation v American Express Wholesale Currency Services Pty Ltd (2010) 187 FCR 398 cited George v Rockett (1990) 170 CLR 104 discussed H v The Minister of Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 63 ALD 43 cited Re Hinchliffe [1895] 1 Ch 117 cited Robowash Pty Ltd v Robowash Finance Pty Ltd (2000) 158 FLR 338 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate