Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Brock v Minister for Home Affairs [2011] FCAFC 167 Citation: Brock v Minister for Home Affairs [2011] FCAFC 167
Appeal from: Brock v Minister for Home Affairs [2010] FCA 1301
Parties: GEORGE PAUL BROCK v MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS
File number: NSD 1708 of 2010
Judges: DOWNES, Yates, Katzmann JJ
Date of judgment: 21 December 2011
Catchwords: EXTRADITION – surrender decision – s 16 notice claimed invalid – minister not misdirected – no lack of procedural fairness – decision-maker not required to reveal nuances of considerations for comment – s 16 notice sufficiently described conduct – s 16 notice valid
Legislation: Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 16, 19, 22, 23
Cases cited: Brock v Minister for Home Affairs [2008] FCAFC 165; (2008) 170 FCR 434 Brock v Minister for Justice and Customs [2007] FCA 2091; (2007) 243 ALR 315 Brock v United States of America [2007] FCAFC 3; (2007) 157 FCR 121 Calvin v Carr [1980] AC 574 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 Kioa v West [1985] HCA 81; (1985) 159 CLR 550 O'Connor v Zentai (2011) 195 FCR 515 Richardson v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 116 University of Wollongong v Metwally (No 2) (1985) 59 ALJR 481 Williams v Minister for Justice and Customs [2007] FCAFC 33; (2007) 157 FCR 286
Date of hearing: 11 November 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 35
Counsel for the Appellant: The appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr S Lloyd SC with Ms J Gleeson
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate