Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Maman [2012] FCAFC 13 Citation: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Maman [2012] FCAFC 13
Appeal from: Maman v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] FMCA 426
Parties: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP v JIMMY MAMAN AND ANOR
File number: NSD 1051 of 2011
Judges: FLICK, FOSTER AND KATZMANN JJ
Date of judgment: 28 February 2012
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – common law rules of procedural fairness – no disclosure of letter – relevant and significant – no continuing obligation of confidentiality MIGRATION – Judicial review of Migration Review Tribunal decision — refusal of partner residence visa —domestic violence claim — procedural fairness —receipt by Department of prejudicial letter from sponsor — two opinions of independent expert that applicant was not a victim of domestic violence committed by sponsor — Tribunal considered itself bound by opinion — whether opinion formed in denial of procedural fairness — whether procedural fairness required letter or its substance to be disclosed to applicant — whether information in letter was "credible, relevant and significant" PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – notice of contention – need to "specify briefly" the grounds relied on
Legislation: Customs Act 1901 (Cth) Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 29, 30, 31, 65, 348, 349, 357A, 359, 359A, 440 Federal Court Rules O 52 r 22 Federal Court Rules 2011 r 36.24 Migration Amendment Regulations 2007 (No 13) (Cth) Migration Amendment Regulations 2009 (No 7) (Cth) Migration Amendment Regulations 2009 (No 12) (Cth) reg. 6 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg. 1.21, reg. 1.23, reg. 3.2, Schedule 2 clause 801.221 Co-Operation Act 1923 (NSW)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate