Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Tuitaalili v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCAFC 24 Citation: Tuitaalili v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCAFC 24
Appeal from: Tuitaalili v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2011] FCA 1224
Parties: MORELI TUITAALILI v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP AND ANOR
File number: NSD 2091 of 2011
Judges: FLICK, JAGOT and barker JJ
Date of judgment: 13 March 2012
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for judicial review – where AAT had not considered the best interests or interests of children known to the appellant – whether this issue was raised before the AAT such that the AAT was bound to consider it – appeal dismissed
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Cases cited: Chen v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs (2000) 106 FCR 157; [2000] FCA 1901 Comcare v Davies [2008] FCA 393 Hussain v Minister for Foreign Affairs (2008) 169 FCR 241; [2008] FCAFC 128 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZIAI (2009) 259 ALR 429; [2009] HCA 39 NABE v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (No 2) (2004) 144 FCR 1; [2004] FCAFC 263 Roy Morgan Research Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (2010) 184 FCR 448; [2010] FCAFC 52 SGBB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2003) 199 ALR 364; [2003] FCA 709 Shi v Migration Agents Registration Authority (2008) 235 CLR 286; [2008] HCA 31
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate