Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZJDS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCAFC 27 Citation: SZJDS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCAFC 27
Appeal from: SZJDS v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship & Anor [2011] FMCA 681
Parties: SZJDS v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1590 of 2011
Judges: RARES, COWDROY AND JESSUP JJ
Date of judgment: 13 March 2012
Catchwords: MIGRATION – application for review required by s 347(1)(a) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) to be made in the approved form – two approved forms, one for persons in immigration detention and one for persons not in immigration detention – whether application valid if wrong approved form used – whether nomination of person made in wrong approved form as applicant's authorised recipient of documents under s 379G authorised Migration Review Tribunal to give that person invitation to applicant to appear at hearing under s 360A(2)(a) – whether earlier nomination of authorised recipient on wrong approved form superseded by later inconsistent nomination on correct approved from – whether Tribunal committed jurisdictional error
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 23(b), s 25C Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) 140(1) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 27, Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 46, 116, 338, 347, 348, 357A, 359A, 360, 360A, 379A, 379G, 476 Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) regs 4.39, 4.10(4)(a), 5.02 The Constitution s 75(v)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate