Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Brar [2012] FCAFC 30 Citation: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Brar [2012] FCAFC 30
Appeal from: Brar v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2011] FMCA 435
Parties: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP v MANJINDER SINGH BRAR and MIGRATION REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 1370 of 2011
Judges: NORTH, GREENWOOD AND BESANKO JJ
Date of judgment: 21 March 2012
Catchwords: MIGRATION - STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – appeal from orders of Federal Magistrates Court on judicial review – construction of ss 103 and 107 of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether failure to identify correct recipient under s 103 fatal to s 107 notice for purposes of cancellation of visa under ss 108 and 109. Held: Appeal allowed – proceeding remitted to the Federal Magistrates Court to consider other grounds of application for judicial review – ss 107 and 108 should be read in light of the statutory purpose to ensure procedural fairness through provision of sufficient particulars of alleged non-compliance. MIGRATION – STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – consideration of requirements of 359A(1) – whether information and invitation given by Migration Review Tribunal misleading Held: Appeal allowed – s 359A(1) requires only that clear particulars of information the Tribunal considers would lead to affirmation of decision under review be given – inclusion of additional information or finding of fact does not result in non-compliance.
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 97, 101, 103, 107, 109, 359A Migration Amendment (Border Integrity) Act 2007 (Cth) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 1.03
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate