Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQHH [2012] FCAFC 45 Citation: Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZQHH [2012] FCAFC 45
Appeal from: SZQHH v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2011] FMCA 740
Parties: MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP v SZQHH and STEVE KARAS IN HIS CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT MERITS REVIEWER
File number: NSD 2325 of 2011
Judges: RARES, FLICK AND JAGOT JJ
Date of judgment: 27 March 2012
Corrigendum 2 April 2012
Catchwords: MIGRATION – appeal from decision of Federal Magistrates Court by the Minister – whether independent merits reviewer failed to disclose material relevant to the respondent's claim such that it constituted a breach of procedural fairness – whether apprehension of bias on part of reviewer – where reasons for decision followed a template used for several generic claims – appeal allowed
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 46A Convention relating to the Status of Refugees, opened for signature 28 July 1951, 189 UNTS 150 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, entered into force 4 October 1967, 606 UNTS 267
Cases cited: Applicant VEAL of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 225 CLR 88; [2005] HCA 72 affirmed British American Tobacco Australia Services Limited v Laurie [2011] HCA 2, 242 CLR 283 cited Drake and Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (No 2), Re (1979) 2 ALD 634 cited Dunghutti Elders Council (Aboriginal Corporation) RNTBC v Registrar of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporations [2011] FCA 370, 279 ALR 138 cited Dunghutti Elders Council (Aboriginal Corporation) RNTBC v Registrar of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporations [2011] FCAFC 88, 195 FCR 318 cited Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy [2000] HCA 63, 205 CLR 337 cited Huluba v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1995) 59 FCR 518 considered J.R.L., Re, Ex parte C.J.L. (1986) 161 CLR 342 Johnson v Johnson [2000] HCA 48, 201 CLR 488 cited Jones v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2002] FCA 1054, 76 ALD 424 cited Karina Fisheries Pty Ltd v Evans (unreported, FCA, Forster J, 1 July 1988) cited Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 considered Lek v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1993) 43 FCR 100 considered McVeigh v Willarra Pty Ltd (1984) 6 FCR 587 cited Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24 referred to Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Kumar (2009) 238 CLR 448; [2009] HCA 10 referred to Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Maman [2012] FCAFC 13 cited Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Jia Legeng (2001) 205 CLR 507; [2001] HCA 17 affirmed NADH of 2001 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2004) 214 ALR 264; [2004] FCAFC 328 affirmed Nevistic v Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs (1981) 51 FLR 325 considered Plaintiff M61/2010E v Commonwealth (2010) 243 CLR 319; [2010] HCA 41 affirmed R v The Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission; Ex parte The Angliss Group (1969) 122 CLR 546 cited Re JRL; Ex parte CJL (1986) 161 CLR 342 referred to Re Refugee Review Tribunal; Ex parte H (2001) 179 ALR 425; [2001] HCA 28 affirmed Reece v Webber [2011] FCAFC 33, 192 FCR 254 cited Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 241 CLR 252; [2010] HCA 23 referred to Secretary of the Department of Veterans' Affairs v Studdert [2001] FCA 1642 cited Stollery v Greyhound Racing Control Board (1972) 128 CLR 509 cited SZBEL v Minister for Immigration (2006) 228 CLR 152; [2006] HCA 63 affirmed SZJTQ v Minsiter for Immigration and Citizenship (2008) 172 FCR 563; [2008] FCA 1938 referred to SZNRZ v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] FCA 107 cited SZQHH v Minister for Immigration [2011] FMCA 740 affirmed The Queen v Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Commission; Ex parte Angliss Group (1969) 122 CLR 546 affirmed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate