Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Metcash Trading Limited (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 55 Citation: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Metcash Trading Limited (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 55
Appeal from: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Metcash Trading Limited [2011] FCA 967
Parties: AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION v METCASH TRADING LIMITED ACN 000 031 569 and PICK N PAY RETAILERS (PTY) LTD
File number(s): NSD 1533 of 2011
Judges: FINN, BUCHANAN, YATES JJ
Date of judgment: 18 April 2012
Catchwords: COSTS – application for indemnity costs – failure to accept an offer to compromise – whether failure unreasonable in the circumstances
Legislation: Federal Court Rules 2011 rr 25.01, 25.14
Cases cited: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Metcash Trading Limited (2011) 198 FCR 297 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Metcash Trading Ltd [2011] FCA 1079 Clark v Commissioner of Taxation [2010] FCA 415 Sagacious Legal Pty Ltd v Wesfarmers General Insurance Ltd [2011] FCAFC Uniline Australia Ltd ACN 010 752 057 v SBriggs Pty Ltd ACN 007 415 518 (No. 2) [2009] FCA 920
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 22 December 2011
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 23
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate