Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZOOR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCAFC 58 Citation: SZOOR v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCAFC 58
Appeal from: SZOOR v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2011] FMCA 253
Parties: SZOOR v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and REFUGEE REVIEW TRIBUNAL
File number: NSD 603 of 2011
Judges: RARES, MCKERRACHER AND REEVES JJ
Date of judgment: 27 April 2012
Corrigendum: 29 May 2012
Catchwords: MIGRATION – judicial review decision of the Refugee Review Tribunal under Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Tribunal's obligation to give reasons for decision under s 430(1) – circumstances in which illogicality or irrationality will amount to jurisdictional error – significance of reasons in determining if decision affected by illogicality or irrationality – where reasons relied in part on an anonymous 'dob-in' letter containing unverified assertions about the truthfulness of the appellant's claims. Held – no illogicality or irrationality sufficient to give rise to jurisdictional error if decision one at which logical or rational person could arrive on same material, if there was some evidence before Tribunal on which decision could be based – lack of logic or rationality in the decision making process, as disclosed by reasons for decision does not of itself give rise to reviewable error – Tribunal reached conclusion that appellant's claims were untruthful independently of anonymous letter – Tribunal's reliance on letter was separate ground – not a jurisdictional error: appeal dismissed.
Legislation: Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 25D Constitution s 75(v) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 36, 65, 412, 414, 415, 430
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate