Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Qantas Airways Limited v Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association [2012] FCAFC 63 Citation: Qantas Airways Limited v Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association [2012] FCAFC 63
Appeal from: Australian Licensed Aircraft Engineers Association v Qantas Airways Ltd & Anor [2011] FMCA 58
Parties: QANTAS AIRWAYS LIMITED and PETER CAWTHORNE v AUSTRALIAN LICENSED AIRCRAFT ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION
File number: NSD 381 of 2011
Judges: GRAY, NORTH AND BESANKO JJ
Date of judgment: 4 May 2012
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – Adverse action – where respondent alleged appellants altered employee's position to his prejudice – consideration of what constitutes prejudicial alteration - whether effect of alteration real and substantial – whether employee in cadre of people to whom action is directed – consideration of time at which action is to be assessed INDUSTRIAL LAW – Coercion – consideration of elements of coercion – procedural fairness – where federal magistrate raised one basis of the element of unlawfulness with the parties but decided claim on another basis – where appellants alleged reasons of federal magistrate were inconsistent with his earlier decision refusing respondent leave to amend pleadings – whether finding outside pleaded case - conduct of parties in the case determinative
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)
Cases cited: Community and Public Sector Union & Another v Telstra Corporation Limited (2001) 107 FCR 93 considered Australian Meat Industry Employees Union v Belandra Pty Ltd (2003) 126 IR 165 considered Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate