Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Repatriation Commission v Knight [2012] FCAFC 83 Citation: Repatriation Commission v Knight [2012] FCAFC 83
Appeal from: Knight v Repatriation Commission [2011] AATA 496
Parties: REPATRIATION COMMISSION v JACQUELINE KNIGHT
File number: NSD 1359 of 2011
Judges: FINN, GILMOUR & PERRAM JJ
Date of judgment: 6 June 2012
Catchwords: DEFENCE AND WAR – Veterans' entitlements – widow's pension claim – death of veteran from myocardial infarction following exposure to tobacco smoke in the Navy – application of Statement of Principles concerning Ischaemic Heart Disease (No 89 of 2007) to determine whether death was 'war-caused' – whether Tribunal considered connexion between service and death – whether Tribunal should instead have considered connexion between service and smoke exposure – whether Tribunal erroneously imposed a burden of proof – whether the last exposure to tobacco smoke during operational service must be within five years of the clinical onset of ischaemic heart disease in order for cl 6(i) of the Statement of Principles to be satisfied ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Administrative Appeals Tribunal – whether Tribunal took irrelevant considerations into account – whether Tribunal failed to make necessary findings – whether Tribunal failed to give reasons – whether the Court, having detected error in the reasoning of the Tribunal, may nonetheless dismiss the appeal on the basis that, despite the error, the Tribunal's decision was plainly correct
Legislation: Veterans' Entitlements Act 1986 (Cth) ss 13(1)(a), 41(1), 120, 120A, 196B(14) Statement of Principles Concerning Ischaemic Heart Disease (No 89 of 2007) cll 5, 6(i)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate