Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Drenth v Comcare [2012] FCAFC 86 Citation: Drenth v Comcare [2012] FCAFC 86
Appeal from: Drenth v Comcare [2011] AATA 582
Parties: SARAH MARGARET DRENTH v COMCARE
File number: SAD 228 of 2011
Judges: RARES, MCKERRACHER AND MURPHY JJ
Date of judgment: 21 May 2012
Corrigendum: 13 June 2012
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 ss 44(1), 44(3)(b) Safety Rehabilitation and Compensation Act 1988 ss 5A, s 7(7) Public Service Act 1999 (Cth)
Cases cited: Brown v Repatriation Commission (1985) 7 FCR 302 applied Birdseye v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2003) 76 ALD 321 applied Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Reeve (2012) 199 FCR 463 applied Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission (1999) 199 CLR 135 applied Hart v Comcare (2005) 145 FCR 29 referred to Hudson v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2012) 126 ALD 40 applied Date of hearing: 21 May 2012
Place: Adelaide
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 38
Counsel for the Applicant: Mr G Britton
Solicitor for the Applicant: T F Owen & Co
Counsel for the Respondent: Mr T Howe QC with Mr D Richards
Solicitor for the Respondent: Sparke Helmore
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Drenth v Comcare [2012] FCAFC 86 CORRIGENDUM 1 The heading above [27] to be amended by deleting the word "discourse" and inserting "condition" so that Question 3 reads as follows:
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate