Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Hillam v Ample Source International Limited (No 3) [2012] FCAFC 88 Citation: Hillam v Ample Source International Limited (No 3) [2012] FCAFC 88
Appeal from: Ample Source International Limited v Bonython Metals Group Pty Limited; In the Matter of Bonython Metals Group Pty Limited (No 6) [2011] FCA 1484 Ample Source International Limited v Bonython Metals Group Pty Limited; In the Matter of Bonython Metals Group Pty Limited (No 7) [2012] FCA 137
Parties: JOHN HILLAM and SAROBOL TEERANUKUL v AMPLE SOURCE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED and BONYTHON METALS GROUP PTY LIMITED
File number: NSD 379 of 2012
Judges: EMMETT, JACOBSON AND BUCHANAN JJ
Date of judgment: 1 May 2012
Date of hearing: 30 April and 1 May 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 11
Counsel for the appellants: BW Rayment QC, MJ Gollan
Solicitor for the appellants: Allsop Glover
Counsel for the first respondent: B O'Donnell QC, JC Giles
Solicitor for the first respondent: McCullough Robertson
Counsel for the second respondent: The second respondent did not appear
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 379 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: JOHN HILLAM
First Appellant
SAROBOL TEERANUKUL
Second Appellant
AND: AMPLE SOURCE INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
First Respondent
BONYTHON METALS GROUP PTY LIMITED
Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate