Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Management 3 Group Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Lenny's Commercial Kitchens Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 92 Citation: Management 3 Group Pty Ltd (In Liq) v Lenny's Commercial Kitchens Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 92
Appeal from: Management 3 Group Pty Ltd (in liq) v Lenny's Commercial Kitchens Pty Ltd (No 2) [2011] FCA 663
Parties: MANAGEMENT 3 GROUP PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 100 863 036) and ANDREW REGINALD YEO AND GESS MICHAEL RAMBALDI (AS LIQUIDATORS OF MANAGEMENT 3 GROUP PTY LTD (IN LIQUIDATION) (ACN 100 863 036) v LENNY'S COMMERCIAL KITCHENS PTY LTD (ACN 009 044 295) and SINO IRON PTY LTD (ACN 058 429 708)
File number: VID 735 of 2011
Judges: LANDER, GILMOUR & GORDON JJ
Date of judgment: 25 June 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – pre-judgment interest – date from which interest is to run – interest to run until judgment is entered – rate at which interest accrues – whether penalty interest rate or Reserve Bank of Australia cash rate plus 4% – Practice Note CM16 Pre-judgment Interest – Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), ss 51A, 52
Legislation: Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) Penalty Interest Rates Act 1983 (Vic)
Cases cited: AA Shi Pty Ltd v Avbar Pty Ltd (No 5) [2010] FCA 971 Alec Finlayson Pty Ltd v Armidale City Council (unreported, Burchett J, 6 March 1998) Batchelor v Burke (1981) 148 CLR 448 Borthwick v The Elderslie Steamship Company Limited (No 2) [1905] 2 KB 516 EMCL Pty Ltd v Esanda Finance Corporation Ltd (No 2) (1998) 160 ALR 382 Fair Work Ombudsman v Ramsey Food Processing Pty Ltd (2011) 198 FCR 174 GEC Marconi Systems Pty Ltd (t/as Easams Australia) v BHP Information Technology Pty Ltd (2003) 201 ALR 55; [2003] FCA 688 Holtby v Hodgson (1889) 24 QBD 103 Hungerfords v Walker (1989) 171 CLR 125 Kalls Enterprises Pty Ltd (In liquidation) v Baloglow (No 3) [2007] NSWCA 298 Kazar v Kargarian (2011) 197 FCR 113 Kettle Chip Company Pty Ltd v Apand Pty Ltd (No 2) (1998) 83 FCR 466 Lactos Fresh Pty Ltd v Finishing Services Pty Ltd (No 2) [2006] FCA 748 Markets Nominees Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCA 262 MBP (SA) Pty Ltd v Gogic (1991) 171 CLR 657 McCormick v Riverwood International (Australia) Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 32 Nagy v Masters Dairy Ltd (1996) 150 ALR 273 Namol Pty Ltd v AW Baulderstone Pty Ltd (No 2) (1993) 47 FCR 388 Nicol v Allyacht Spars Pty Ltd (No 2) (1988) 165 CLR 306 Primus Telecommunications Pty Ltd v Kooee Communications Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 8 Rafferty v Time 2000 West Pty Ltd (No 5) [2010] FCA 873 Thompson v Faraonio (1979) 24 ALR 1 Todorovic v Waller (1981) 150 CLR 402 Wheeler v Page (1982) 31 SASR 1 White Industries (Qld) Pty Ltd v Flower & Hart (2000) 103 FCR 559
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate