Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Commissioner of Taxation v Visy Industries USA Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 106 Citation: Commissioner of Taxation v Visy Industries USA Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 106
Appeal from: Visy Industries USA Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2011] FCA 1065
Parties: THE COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA v VISY INDUSTRIES USA PTY LTD (ACN 005 449 445)
File numbers: VID 1124 of 2011 VID 1125 of 2011
Judges: EDMONDS, GREENWOOD & ROBERTSON JJ
Date of judgment: 10 August 2012
Catchwords: INCOME TAX – whether payment to related company for indemnifying taxpayer company against loss under anterior forward exchange contract with another related company an allowable deduction under s 8-1 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) – anterior forward exchange contract found to have been entered into for the purpose of profit-making and in the course of taxpayer's business albeit not in the ordinary course of that business – held that finding open on the primary facts as found – any loss, being in consequence, on revenue account, the indemnity payment was of the same character and deductible in the year in which it was incurred – deductibility was not to be denied on the basis that it was to be taken into account in some later year as part of the cost of a wider profit-making transaction
Legislation: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 51(1) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 8-1
Cases cited: Australian National Hotels Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1988) 19 FCR 234 referred to Babka v Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 89 ALR 373 cited BP Australia Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1965) 112 CLR 386 cited Brajkovich v Commissioner of Taxation (1989) 89 ALR 408 cited Commercial and General Acceptance Limited v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1977) 137 CLR 37 cited Commissioner of Taxation v Myer Emporium Ltd (1986–1987) 163 CLR 199 followed Commissioner of Taxation v Raymor (NSW) Pty Ltd (1990) 24 FCR 90 cited Commissioner of Taxation v Smith (1981) 147 CLR 578 applied Federal Coke Co Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1977) 34 FLR 375 cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Ashwick (Qld) No 127 Pty Ltd (2011) 192 FCR 325 cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v BHP Billiton Finance Limited (2010) 182 FCR 526 cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Citylink Melbourne Limited (2006) 228 CLR 1 cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Midland Railway Co of Western Australia Ltd (1952) 85 CLR 306 cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Montgomery (1999) 198 CLR 639 discussed Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Orica Ltd (1998) 194 CLR 500 referred to Federal Commissioner of Taxation v South Australian Battery Makers (1978) 140 CLR 645 cited Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Spotless Services Ltd (1996) 186 CLR 404 referred to GP International Pipecoaters Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1990) 170 CLR 124 cited GRE Insurance Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1992) 34 FCR 160 cited Hallstroms Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1946) 72 CLR 634 followed Investment and Merchant Finance Corporation Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1971) 125 CLR 249 cited National Australian Bank Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1997) 80 FCR 352 cited Ransburg Australia Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1980) 47 FLR 177 referred to Sun Newspapers Ltd and Associated Newspapers Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1938) 61 CLR 337 followed W Nevill & Co Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1937) 56 CLR 290 cited WD & HO Wills (Aust) Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1996) 65 FCR 298 referred to Western Gold Mines NL v Commissioner of Taxation (WA) (1938) 59 CLR 729 cited Parsons RW, Income Taxation in Australia: Principles of Income, Deductibility and Tax Accounting (Law Book Company, 1985)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate