Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
King v Jetstar Airways Pty Limited [2012] FCAFC 115 Citation: King v Jetstar Airways Pty Limited [2012] FCAFC 115
Appeal from: King v Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 8
Parties: SHEILA KING v JETSTAR AIRWAYS PTY LIMITED
File number(s): NSD 165 of 2012
Judges: LANDER, FLICK AND JAGOT JJ
Date of judgment: 23 August 2012
Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – disability discrimination – whether test for unjustifiable hardship correctly applied – whether findings supported by evidence PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – leave to amend notice of appeal – whether proposed grounds of appeal consistent with case put to primary judge – where proposed grounds could have been met by calling evidence below
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth)
Cases cited: AB v State of Western Australia (2011) 244 CLR 390; [2011] HCA 42 Carr v Baker (1936) 36 SR (NSW) 301 Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1 Gama v Qantas Airways Limited (No 2) [2006] FMCA 1767 Hunter v Transport Accident Commission (2005) 43 MVR 130; [2005] VSCA 1 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 King v Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd (No 2) (2012) 286 ALR 149; [2012] FCA 8 Police Federation of Australia v Nixon (2011) 198 FCR 267; [2011] FCAFC 161 Sharma v Legal Aid (Qld) 115 IR 91; [2002] FCAFC 196 Suttor v Gundowda Pty Ltd (1950) 81 CLR 418
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate