Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Wijayaweera v Saint Gobain Abrasives Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 128 Citation: Wijayaweera v Saint Gobain Abrasives Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 128
Appeal from: Wijayaweera v Saint Gobain Abrasives Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 97 Wijayaweera v Saint Gobain Abrasives Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 98
Parties: ANUPRIYA WIJAYAWEERA v SAINT GOBAIN ABRASIVES PTY LTD (ACN 068 931 420), CRAIG TOWNER, FRANCOIS XAVIER LIENHART and CATHERINE HOBBS
File number: VID 176 of 2012
Judges: GRAY, EDMONDS AND ROBERTSON JJ
Date of judgment: 6 September 2012
Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – trial – submission of no case to answer – respondents not required to elect whether or not to call evidence – whether error in exercise of discretion APPEAL AND NEW TRIAL – refusal of adjournment of trial for purpose of amending statement of claim – trial proceeded – application dismissed – grounds of appeal relating principally to interlocutory orders – whether leave to appeal required - whether interlocutory order affecting final result can be challenged in appeal as of right
Legislation: Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986 (Cth) s 46PO Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 180, 181, 182, 183, 184
Cases cited: Gerlach v Clifton Bricks Pty Ltd [2002] HCA 22 (2002) 209 CLR 478 applied Residues Treatment & Trading Co Ltd v Southern Resources Ltd (1989) 52 SASR 54 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate