Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Newman v New Zealand (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 139 Citation: Newman v New Zealand (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 139
Appeal from: Newman v New Zealand [2011] QSC 257
Parties: ALLAN REX NEWMAN v NEW ZEALAND
File number: QUD 250 of 2011
Judges: SIOPIS, GREENWOOD AND LOGAN JJ
Date of judgment: 3 October 2012
Catchwords: EXTRADITION – costs – whether costs in proceedings below should follow event – principal judgment held differences in law as between Australia and New Zealand in respect of permissibility of representative charges amount to unfairness – where some of charges specified in warrant of a representative character – costs in Supreme Court of Queensland for review of warrant to follow the event – nature of proceeding before Magistrate such that no entitlement to costs
Legislation: Constitution s 77 Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) s 4AAA Extradition Act 1988 (Cth) ss 19, 34, 35, 46 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 24, 28, 43 Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 79 Justices Act 1886 (Qld) ss 158, 158A Supreme Court of Queensland Act 1991 (Qld) s 85 Federal Court Rules 1979 (Cth) O 62 r 3, O 62 r 5 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld) r 680, r 681
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate