Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney [2012] FCAFC 146 Citation: Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney [2012] FCAFC 146
Parties: FAWZY SOLIMAN v UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, SYDNEY and FAIR WORK AUSTRALIA
File number: NSD 1376 of 2011
Judges: MARSHALL, NORTH AND FLICK JJ
Date of judgment: 24 October 2012
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – no evidence ground – review of merits review application – evidence submitted by anonymous person – value of evidence matter for tribunal conducting merits review INDUSTRIAL LAW – construction of enterprise agreement – meaning of "misconduct" – significance of context – whether administrative decision-maker entitled to have regard to own knowledge and experience in giving meaning to term INDUSTRIAL LAW – Fair Work Australia – reasons – whether Fair Work Australia under implied duty to give reasons – approach to be taken to reasons given by Fair Work Australia ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – administrative decision-makers – reasons – whether failure to give reasons amounts to jurisdictional error – whether failure to consider or resolve submissions advanced amounts to jurisdictional error
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 43 Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 13 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution s 75(v) Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) ss 39B, 44 Migration Act 1958 (Cth) s 430 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s 709 University of Technology, Sydney Academic Staff Agreement 2006
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate