Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SZQRW v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCAFC 164 Citation: SZQRW v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCAFC 164
Appeal from: SZQRW v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2012] FMCA 191
Parties: SZQRW v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND CITIZENSHIP and ROSA GAGLIARDI IN HER CAPACITY AS INDEPENDENT MERITS REVIEWER
File number: NSD 521 of 2012
Judges: JACOBSON, SIOPIS AND MURPHY JJ
Date of judgment: 19 November 2012
Catchwords: MIGRATION – the independent merits reviewer misstated the appellant's version of events in part of her reasons – whether the independent reviewer failed to consider the appellant's claim or an integer of the appellant's claim – whether the independent reviewer took into account irrelevant material and failed to take into account relevant material – whether the appellant was denied natural justice – whether the independent reviewer's error deprived the appellant of the possibility of a successful outcome.
Cases cited: VAAD v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCAFC 117 MZXSA v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 117 ALD 441
Date of hearing: 10 August 2012
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 62
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr B O'Donnell
Solicitor for the Appellant: Legal Aid Commission of New South Wales
Counsel for the First Respondent: Ms R Francois
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Clayton Utz
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 521 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate