Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Comcare v Post Logistics Australasia Pty Limited [2012] FCAFC 168 Citation: Comcare v Post Logistics Australasia Pty Limited [2012] FCAFC 168
Appeal from: Comcare v Post Logistics Australasia Pty Limited [2011] FCA 1422
Parties: COMCARE v POST LOGISTICS AUSTRALASIA PTY LIMITED ACN 002 579 115
File number: NSD 105 of 2012
Judges: RARES, COWDROY & GRIFFITHS JJ
Date of judgment: 23 November 2012
Catchwords: INDUSTRIAL LAW – breach of s 16(1) Occupational Health and Safety Act 1991 (Cth) – quantity of penalty imposed under Sch 2 cl 4 – relevance of deterrence in assessing civil pecuniary penalties under Sch 2 cl 4 – relevance of prior breach of s 16(1) – foreseeability of risk of injury – whether primary judge failed to take into account admission and concession of the respondent – whether primary judge denied procedural fairness in rejection of proposed penalty ranges – whether manifest inadequacy of penalty
Legislation: Occupational Health and Safety Act 1991 (Cth) ss 3, 11, 16 and Sch 2 cl 2, 4, 5
Cases cited: Australian Communications and Media Authority v Radio 2UE Sydney Pty Ltd (No 2) (2009) 178 FCR 199 Australian Ophthalmic Supplies Pty Ltd v McAlary-Smith (2008) 165 FCR 560 Australian Prudential Regulation Authority v Derstepanian (2005) 60 ATR 518 Carroll v The Queen (2009) 254 ALR 379 Comcare v Australian Postal Corporation [2011] FCA 530 Comcare v Commonwealth (2007) 163 FCR 207 Comcare v Commonwealth of Australia (2009) 184 IR 441 Comcare v John Holland Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 449 Comcare v John Holland Rail Pty Ltd (2009) 188 IR 415 Comcare v National Gallery of Australia (2007) 98 ALD 67 Comcare v Post Logistics Australasia Pty Ltd (2008) 178 IR 200 Comcare v Subsee Explorer Pty Ltd (2011) 210 IR 322 Comcare v Transpacific Industries Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 90 Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2007) 162 FCR 466 Community and Public Sector Union v Telstra Corporation Ltd (2001) 108 IR 228 Dinsdale v The Queen (2000) 202 CLR 321 Draffin v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2009) 189 IR 145 Durayappah v Fernando [1967] 2 AC 337 Fair Work Ombudsman v Wongtas Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCA 30 Greentree v Minister for the Environment and Heritage (2005) 144 FCR 388 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 Kable v Director of Public Prosecutions (1995) 36 NSWLR 374 Minister for the Environment and Heritage v Greentree (No 3) (2004) 136 LGERA 89 Minister for Industry, Tourism and Resources v Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd (2004) ATPR 41-993 Muldrock v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 120 Plancor Pty Ltd v Liquor Hospitality and Miscellaneous Union (2008) 177 IR 243 R v Hamieh [2010] NSWCCA 189 R v Harrison (1997) 93 A Crim R 314 R v Radich [1954] NZLR 86 R v Romanic [2000] NSWCCA 524 R v Rushby [1977] 1 NSWLR 594 R v Porter (1933) 55 CLR 182 Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2004) 220 CLR 129 R v Scognamiglio (1991) 56 A Crim R 81 Secretary, Department of Health and Ageing v Pagasa Australia Pty Ltd [2008] FCA 1545 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd (1991) ATPR 41-076 York v R (2005) 225 CLR 466
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate