Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
George v Fletcher (Trustee) (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 170 Citation: George v Fletcher (Trustee) (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 170
Appeal from: Fletcher v George & Ors [2011] FMCA 553
Parties: LAUREN KAY GEORGE v WILLIAM JOHN FLETCHER AS TRUSTEE FOR THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF LAUREN KAY GEORGE, DR PETER IRONSIDE PTY LTD (ACN 008 126 387), PETER DOUGLAS IRONSIDE and NATIONAL AUSTRALIA BANK
File number: QUD 192 of 2011
Judges: SIOPIS, JESSUP AND KATZMANN JJ
Date of judgment: 5 December 2012
Catchwords: COSTS – Application for variation of costs order – appellant successful on only one of several issues and ordered to pay 90% of the first respondent's costs
Legislation: Bankruptcy Regulations 1996 (Cth), reg 6.03
Cases cited: George v Fletcher (Trustee) [2012] FCAFC 148 Hewlett Packard Pty Ltd v GE Capital Finance Pty Ltd [2003] FCAFC 278
Date of hearing: Determined on the papers
Date of last submissions: 29 November 2012
Place: Sydney (via video link to Brisbane)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 5
Solicitor for the Appellant: The appellant was self-represented
Solicitor for the First Respondent: Holman Webb Lawyers
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA QUEENSLAND DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION QUD192 of 2011
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL MAGISTRATES COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: LAUREN KAY GEORGE
Appellant
AND: WILLIAM JOHN FLETCHER AS TRUSTEE FOR THE BANKRUPT ESTATE OF LAUREN KAY GEORGE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate