Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SPI Electricity Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal [2012] FCAFC 186 Citation: SPI Electricity Pty Ltd v Australian Competition Tribunal [2012] FCAFC 186
Appeal from: Application by United Energy Distribution Pty Ltd [2012] ACompT 1 Application by United Energy Distribution Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] ACompT 8
Parties: SPI ELECTRICITY PTY LTD v AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION TRIBUNAL and AUSTRALIAN ENERGY REGULATOR
File number: VID 338 of 2012
Judges: MANSFIELD, BESANKO and MCKERRACHER JJ
Date of judgment: 20 December 2012
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review of a decision of the Australian Competition Tribunal (Tribunal) – construction of Part 6, Division 3A, Subdivision 2 of the National Electricity Law – where multiple service providers sought review by the Tribunal of distribution determinations of the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) – where the Tribunal found reviewable error in distribution determination of another service provider – where error common to both that service provider and the applicant's distribution determinations – whether s 71O(2) of the National Electricity Law prevented the applicant from raising the issue in its review before the Tribunal – where applicant had raised the matter before the AER but subsequently not pursued the contention – Tribunal found that s 71O(2), inter alia, prevented applicant from agitating matter before the Tribunal – s 71O(2) did not prevent applicant from raising the matter before the Tribunal – error of law committed by the Tribunal when reviewing a distribution determination of the Australian Energy Regulator.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate