Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Sent v Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCAFC 187 Citation: Sent v Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCAFC 187
Appeal from: Sent v Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCA 382
Parties: EDUARD CHRISTIAAN SENT v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number: VID 363 of 2012
Judges: EMMETT, EDMONDS AND RARES JJ
Date of judgment: 19 December 2012
Catchwords: INCOME TAX – whether a payment made to the appellant's nominee in substitution for past and future bonus entitlements of the appellant under his employment agreement, to enable the nominee to take up shares for the appellant, was assessable income of the appellant pursuant to s 6-5 of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) – whether the appellant discharged the onus imposed by s 14ZZK of the Taxation Administration Act 1974 (Cth) of establishing that the assessment by the Commissioner of a 50% administrative penalty was excessive. Held: Appeal dismissed.
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 44 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 14ZZK; Sch 1: ss 284-75, 284-90 Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 6-5
Cases cited: Constable v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1952) 86 CLR 402 distinguished Hallstroms Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (1946) 72 CLR 634 referred to
Date of hearing: 29 November 2012
Place: Sydney (heard in Melbourne)
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 42
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr S Tisher
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate