Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
SBEG v Commonwealth of Australia [2012] FCAFC 189 Citation: SBEG v Commonwealth of Australia [2012] FCAFC 189
Appeal from: SBEG v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2012] FCA 569
Parties: SBEG v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
File number: SAD 139 of 2012
Judges: KEANE CJ, LANDER & SIOPIS JJ
Date of judgment: 20 December 2012
Catchwords: NEGLIGENCE – where appellant unlawful non-citizen refugee in immigration detention – where ASIO issued adverse security assessment against appellant under Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 (Cth) – where cl 866.225 of Sch 2 of Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) prevented the appellant from being granted a protection visa – where High Court has now declared cl 866.225 to be pro tanto invalid: Plaintiff M47/2012 v Director-General of Security [2012] HCA 46 (5 October 2012) – where appellant claims place and circumstances of detention causing mental harm – scope of duty of care owed to appellant – whether appropriate to impose duty of care on respondent to exercise statutory power to approve form of detention in which the appellant could come and go as he pleased – whether such form of detention falls within definition of immigration detention in s 5(1)(b)(v) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – whether breach of duty by keeping appellant in "environment of incarceration" – whether permanent injunction seeking transfer of appellant should be granted – ss 5(1), 189, 196(3), 197AB, 197AC, 197AE 500(1)(c) of Migration Act 1958 (Cth)
Legislation: Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979 (Cth) Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5(1), 189, 196(3), 197AB, 197AC, 197AE 500(1)(c) Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) Sch 2 cl 866.225
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate