Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nojin v Commonwealth of Australia [2012] FCAFC 192 Citation: Nojin v Commonwealth of Australia [2012] FCAFC 192
Appeal from: Nojin v Commonwealth of Australia [2011] FCA 1066
Parties: ELIZABETH NOJIN ON BEHALF OF MICHAEL NOJIN v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and COFFS HARBOUR CHALLENGE INC (IN LIQUIDATION) GORDON PRIOR v COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and STAWELL INTERTWINE SERVICES INC
File numbers: VID 1110 of 2011 VID 1111 of 2011
Judges: BUCHANAN, FLICK AND KATZMANN JJ
Date of judgment: 21 December 2012
Catchwords: HUMAN RIGHTS – discrimination on the ground of disability – intellectually disabled workers employed at Australian Disability Enterprises – use of Business Services Wage Assessment Tool to assess wages –assessment of productivity and "competencies" – whether there was a requirement or condition that to secure a higher wage intellectually disabled workers undergo assessment using the Business Services Wage Assessment Tool – whether appellants were able to comply with requirement or condition – whether a substantially higher proportion of people without intellectual disabilities were able to comply – whether requirement or condition was not reasonable – where wages linked to lowest pay grade in award – where competencies assessed in part by question and answer – where all or nothing assessment of competencies
Legislation: Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) ss 3, 6, 15, 24, 45, 122 Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth) Sex Discrimination Act 1984 (Cth) s 5 Anti-Discrimination Act 1977 (NSW) s 24 Equal Opportunity Act 1984 (Vic) s 17 Australian Liquor, Hospitality and Miscellaneous Workers Union Supported Employment (Business Enterprises) Award 2001
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate