Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Healey v Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCAFC 194 Citation: Healey v Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCAFC 194
Appeal from: Healey v Commissioner of Taxation [2012] FCA 269
Parties: CARINA HEALEY v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number: WAD 102 of 2012
Judges: LANDER, SIOPIS & GILMOUR JJ
Date of judgment: 21 December 2012
Catchwords: INCOME TAX – appeal from a single judge of this Court dismissing an appeal by the appellant from income tax assessment and administrative penalty assessment for failure to lodge tax returns - whether the primary judge erred in concluding that the appellant had failed to discharge her onus in proving that the transaction was not at arm's length - whether the appellant should have called a witness who would have been able to give evidence as to the relationship between the relevant parties - whether it could be inferred that there was a reason for not calling the witness - whether there was sufficient evidence in the documents themselves to show that the parties were not acting at arm's length – whether the primary judge erred in concluding that the appellant had failed to discharge her onus in proving what was the market value of the shares
Legislation: Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) s 167 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) s 14ZZO(a) & (b) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) ss 100-35, Div 102, 102-20, 102-25, 104-60(1) & (3), 108-5, 104-10(1), 109-5, 112-20(1)(c), 995-1
Cases cited: CGU Insurance Limited v One.Tel Limited (In Liquidation) [2010] HCA 26 Commissioner of Taxation for the Commonwealth of Australia v Dalco (1990) 168 CLR 614 Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v BHP Billiton Ltd (2011) 244 CLR 325 Cook's Construction Pty Ltd v Brown and Another (as liqs of DML Resources Pty Ltd (in liq)) (2004) 49 ACSR 62 Danmark Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation; Forestwood Pty Ltd v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1944) 7 ATD 333 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v AXA Asia Pacific Holdings Ltd (2010) 189 FCR 204 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Spencer v The Commonwealth of Australia (1907) 5 CLR 418
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate