Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Director, Office of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FCAFC 8 Citation: Director, Office of the Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2013] FCAFC 8
Appeal from: Cozadinos v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2012] FCA 46
Parties: THE DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF THE FAIR WORK BUILDING INDUSTRY INSPECTORATE v CONSTRUCTION, FORESTRY, MINING AND ENERGY UNION and JASON BELL
File number: VID 177 of 2012
Judges: BESANKO, PERRAM AND BROMBERG JJ
Date of judgment: 6 February 2013
Corrigendum 11 February 2013
Catchwords: EVIDENCE – Cumulative effect of evidence – whether trial judge failed to consider cumulative effect of three witnesses' evidence prior to rejecting that evidence – whether corroborative evidence was in fact coincidence evidence and therefore limited in the use to which it could be put – whether appellant's case so strong that appellate court should find his case proved EVIDENCE – Standard of proof – whether trial judge was required, when considering the 'gravity of the matters alleged' pursuant to s 140 of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth), to consider also the likelihood of their occurrence EVIDENCE – Rule in Jones v Dunkel – whether rule was required to be applied EVIDENCE – Rule in Browne v Dunn – whether rule properly applied
Legislation: Building and Construction Industry Improvement Act 2005 (Cth) ss 44, 45 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 95(1), 98(1), 140, Pt 3.6 Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) Part 8 JD Heydon, Cross on Evidence (LexisNexis Butterworths, 8th ed)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate