Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Weeden v Rambaldi [2013] FCAFC 12 Citation: Weeden v Rambaldi [2013] FCAFC 12
Appeal from: Weeden v Rambaldi [2012] FCA 552
Parties: PHILIP CHARLES WEEDEN v GESS MICHELE RAMBALDI, ANDREW REGINALD YEO (AS JOINT TRUSTEES OF THE PROPERTY OF PHILIP CHARLES WEEDEN, A BANKRUPT), INSPECTOR-GENERAL IN BANKRUPTCY and OFFICIAL RECEIVER IN BANKRUPTCY
File number: VID 418 of 2012
Judges: GRAY, MIDDLETON AND DODDS-STREETON JJ
Date of judgment: 12 February 2013
Catchwords: BANKRUPTCY – trustee – appointment – meeting of creditors to replace trustee – whether meeting appointed single trustee or two joint trustees – prima facie effect of minutes – whether rebutted – whether trial judge made errors in admission of, and allocation of weight to, evidence
Legislation: Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 64Z(4), 64Z(5), 64Z(10), 149, 257 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 251A(6)
Cases cited: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar (2012) 286 ALR 501; [2012] HCA 17 discussed CSR Ltd v Della Maddalena (2006) 224 ALR 1; [2006] HCA 1 cited Fox v Percy (2003) 214 CLR 118; [2003] HCA 22 cited Kelso v Tatiara Meat Co Pty Ltd (2007) 17 VR 592; [2007] VSCA 267 cited Morley v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2010) 274 ALR 205; [2010] NSWCA 331 cited Optical 88 Ltd v Optical 88 Pty Ltd (2011) 197 FCR 67; [2011] FCAFC 130 cited Warren v Coombes (1979) 142 CLR 531 cited
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate