Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Yperion Technology SAS v Luminex Pty Ltd [2013] FCAFC 38 Citation: Yperion Technology SAS v Luminex Pty Ltd [2013] FCAFC 38
Appeal from: Yperion Technology SAS v Luminex Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 554
Parties: YPERION TECHNOLOGY SAS v LUMINEX PTY LTD (ACN 104 913 046), DAVID ERIC HAMMER, EVA KARPATI, HAMMER FAMILY TRUST T/AS LUMINEX (ABN 85 939 288 044), KARPATI FAMILY TRUST T/AS LUMINEX (ABN 85 939 288 044) and KARPTI CORPORATION PTY LTD (ACN 093 564 035)
File number: NSD 784 of 2012
Judges: NORTH, BARKER AND NICHOLAS JJ
Date of judgment: 5 April 2013
Cases cited: One.Tel Ltd v Deputy Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 101 FCR 548
Date of hearing: 13 February 2013
Date of last submissions: 1 March 2013
Place: Sydney
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: No Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 13
Counsel for the Appellant: Mr C A Moore SC with Mr A D B Fox
Solicitor for the Appellant: McCabes Lawyers
Counsel for the Respondents: Mr P W Flynn
Solicitor for the Respondents: McLachlan Thorpe Partners
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA NEW SOUTH WALES DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION NSD 784 of 2012
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: YPERION TECHNOLOGY SAS
Appellant
AND: LUMINEX PTY LTD (ACN 104 913 046)
First Respondent
DAVID ERIC HAMMER
Second Respondent
EVA KARPATI
Third Respondent
HAMMER FAMILY TRUST T/AS LUMINEX (ABN 85 939 288 044)
Fourth Respondent
KARPATI FAMILY TRUST T/AS LUMINEX (ABN 85 939 288 044)
Fifth Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate