Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Cristovao v Registrar Scott [2013] FCAFC 92 Citation: Cristovao v Registrar Scott [2013] FCAFC 92
Appeal from: Cristovao v Registrar Caporale [2012] FCA 1329
Parties: ROGERIO MARTINS CRISTOVAO v REGISTRAR SCOTT
File number: TAD 1 of 2013
Judges: NORTH, SIOPIS AND MCKERRACHER JJ
Date of judgment: 16 August 2013
Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – appeal from dismissal of application for judicial review – whether registrar should have accepted an irregular affidavit for filing – whether costs order made by registrar validly made – whether primary judge afforded the appellant procedural fairness
Legislation: Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) ss 5(1)(f), 5(1)(g), 5(1)(h) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 35A Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 2.27(d), 3.04
Cases cited: Conlan v Pratt (No 2) [2013] FCA 105 Director of Public Prosecutions v Marijancevic [2011] VSCA 355 Forensic Document Examiners Pty Ltd v Cristavao [2011] FCA 843 The Queen v Davison (1954) 90 CLR 353
Date of hearing: 24 May 2013
Place: Perth
Division: GENERAL DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 39
Counsel for the Appellant: The Appellant appeared in person
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent did not appear, filing a submitting notice
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA WESTERN AUSTRALIA DISTRICT REGISTRY GENERAL DIVISION TAD 1 of 2013
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate