Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Paerau v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 28 Citation: Paerau v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] FCAFC 28
Appeal from: Paerau v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCA 1119
Parties: ITI PAERAU v MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION AND BORDER PROTECTION and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number(s): NSD 2358 of 2013
Judge(s): BUCHANAN, BARKER AND PERRY JJ
Date of judgment: 19 March 2014
Catchwords: MIGRATION – Where visa cancelled pursuant to s 501(2) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) due to substantial criminal record – Where decision maker required to comply with Ministerial Direction to take into account as a primary consideration the best interests of minor children – Where appellant prevented from providing oral evidence at the hearing of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal regarding his relationship with children – Whether valid application by Tribunal of ss 500(6H) and (6J) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) – Whether the Tribunal erred in finding that it could not make a determination as to where the best interests of the children lay – Whether Tribunal required to make a determination on the question
Legislation: Migration Act 1958 (Cth), ss 499, 500(1), 500(6H), 500(6J), 501, 501(2), 501(6), 501(7) Migration Legislation Amendment (Strengthening of Provisions Relating to Character and Conduct) Act 1998 (No. 2) (Cth) Convention on the Rights of the Child, opened for signature 20 November 1989, 1577 UNTS 3 (entered into force 2 September 1990) Ministerial Direction No. 55 – Visa refusal and cancellation under s501 (Cth), cl 9.3
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate