Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Batchelor v Commissioner of Taxation [2014] FCAFC 41 Citation: Batchelor v Commissioner of Taxation [2014] FCAFC 41
Appeal from: Batchelor v Commissioner of Taxation [2013] AATA 93
Parties: CAROLINE BATCHELOR v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION
File number: NSD 442 of 2013
Judges: EDMONDS, PAGONE and wigney JJ
Date of judgment: 3 April 2014
Catchwords: INCOME TAX – appeal from Administrative Appeals Tribunal – hearing before and decision of Tribunal conducted and decided upon assumptions not justified on the facts – whether amount received by the applicant as refund of her contribution to deposit paid by partnership of which she was a member was "by way of insurance or indemnity" within para (a) of s 20-20(2) of the Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) ("1997 Act") (successor to s 26(j) of Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) – whether para (b) of s 20-20(2) of 1997 Act requires loss or outgoing recouped to be properly allowable under the statute not just allowable as a matter of administrative concession – whether s 110-45(2)(a) of the 1997 Act excluded from the cost base of an asset the subject of a CGI event an amount erroneously allowed as a deduction – whether there was a failure of the Tribunal to exercise its jurisdiction by failing to affirm decision under review rather than purporting to vary it – Tribunal's decision set aside and proceeding remitted for re-determination
Legislation: Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1977 (Cth) s 43 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 26(j), 92(2) Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) ss 20-20(2), 20-25(1), 104-10, 104-25, 110-45(2)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate