Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Nield v Mathieson (No 2) [2014] FCAFC 86 Citation: Nield v Mathieson (No 2) [2014] FCAFC 86
Appeal from: Mathieson v South End Mixed Business [2013] FCCA 1749
Parties: MARJORIE NIELD and KEITH GEORGE NIELD v BETH LENNESE MATHIESON
File number: VID 30 of 2014
Judges: TRACEY, BROMBERG AND MORTIMER JJ
Date of judgment: 24 July 2014
Catchwords: COSTS - costs under the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – application of s 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009 – where appellants unsuccessful at trial and on appeal
Legislation: Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) – s 570
Cases cited: ACE Insurance Limited v Trifunovski (No 3) [2012] FCA 975 – cited Maritime Union of Australia v Geraldton Port Authority (No 2) (2000) 94 IR 404 – cited Nield v Mathieson [2014] FCAFC 74 – cited
Date of hearing: Heard on the papers
Place: Melbourne
Division: FAIR WORK DIVISION
Category: Catchwords
Number of paragraphs: 6
Counsel for the Appellants: The Appellants did not appear
Solicitor for the Appellants: Gaden and Green
Counsel for the Respondent: The Respondent did not appear
Solicitor for the Respondent: Becklegal
IN THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA VICTORIA DISTRICT REGISTRY FAIR WORK DIVISION VID 30 of 2014
ON APPEAL FROM THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT COURT OF AUSTRALIA
BETWEEN: MARJORIE NIELD
First Appellant
KEITH GEORGE NIELD
Second Appellant
AND: BETH LENNESE MATHIESON
Respondent
JUDGES: TRACEY, BROMBERG AND MORTIMER JJ DATE OF ORDER: 24 july 2014 WHERE MADE: MELBOURNE
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate