Federal Court of Australia
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
IOOF Holdings Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2014] FCAFC 91 Citation: IOOF Holdings Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2014] FCAFC 91
Appeal from: IOOF Holdings Limited v Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia [2013] FCA 1189
Parties: IOOF HOLDINGS LIMITED v COMMISSIONER OF TAXATION and ADMINISTRATIVE APPEALS TRIBUNAL
File number: VID 1310 of 2013
Judges: JESSUP, ROBERTSON & DAVIES JJ
Date of judgment: 24 July 2014
Catchwords: TAXATION – whether appellant had an accrued right under s 7(2) of the Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) to have its private ruling application determined in accordance with the law as it stood prior to amendment by the Tax Laws Amendment (2012 Measures No 2) Act 2012 (Cth) – whether accrued right displaced by contrary intention ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether Tribunal can exercise power under s 43(6) of the Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) to apply the law as it stood prior to amendment
Legislation: A New Tax System (Tax Administration) Act 1999 (Cth) Pt 5-5 Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) ss 2, 7 Administrative Appeals Tribunal Act 1975 (Cth) s 43 Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Cth) ss 170BA–170BI Income Tax Assessment Act 1997 (Cth) s 716-405 Tax Laws Amendment (2012 Measures No 2) Act 2012 (Cth) items 50, 51 Taxation Administration Act 1953 (Cth) ss 3AA, 14ZYB, 14ZZ, 359-10, 359-60, and Sch 1 ss 357-5, 357-60, 357-85, 359-5, 359-50
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate